Desperate Doctors and Antitrust Laws: the Best Ways for Lawmakers to Simulate Physician Collective Bargaining

نویسنده

  • Cristina Olson
چکیده

Not only do rising health insurance premiums make us cringe—so do the mistakes of overworked doctors who are trying to make ends meet in the face of a broken healthcare financing system. The unfairness in healthcare financing—that is, the stranglehold that a few powerful insurance companies often wield over doctors’ reimbursements—has prompted some creative solutions, including two recent bills in the California Legislature and one in the New York Assembly. The bills aimed to loosen healthcare antitrust laws and give physicians greater bargaining power against insurance companies. Currently, physicians cannot collectively bargain, so their legal choices for improving profits include: garnering better contract terms through personal negotiation, banding together to use federally approved methods, or squeezing in more patients per day. The prospect of doctors over-scheduling to see more patients each day has lawmakers worried. In a recent example of why that worry is justified, “assem-

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

SYMPOSIUM: ABJS CARL T. BRIGHTON WORKSHOP ON HEALTH POLICY ISSUES IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY Physician Collective Bargaining

Current antitrust enforcement policy unduly restricts physician collaboration, especially among small physician practices. Among other matters, current enforcement policy has hindered the ability of physicians to implement efficient healthcare delivery innovations, such as the acquisition and implementation of health information technology (HIT). Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission and De...

متن کامل

Physician Collective Bargaining

Current antitrust enforcement policy unduly restricts physician collaboration, especially among small physician practices. Among other matters, current enforcement policy has hindered the ability of physicians to implement efficient healthcare delivery innovations, such as the acquisition and implementation of health information technology (HIT). Furthermore, the Federal Trade Commission and De...

متن کامل

حکم اخذ وجه مازاد بر تعرفه توسط پزشکان (زیرمیزی) در مراکز خصوصی از منظر فقه و حقوق

Background and aim: Based on the principle of "Freedom of Contracts" and many arguments such as Tijara-An-Traz which translates as "Trade based on Mutual Consent", autonomy and mutual consent of the parties is considered the most important factor for legitimacy of contracts and deals. Today, however, treatment contracts in the private sector are limited with government&rsquo...

متن کامل

Antitrust and the Supremacy Clause

In the course of damning the market giant Standard Oil, the Supreme Court declared that the purpose of the Sherman Antitrust Act is to prevent "monopoly and the acts which produce the same result as monopoly." The Constitution's Supremacy Clause, in turn, requires preemption-that is, non-enforcement-of state laws that conflict with a federal statute. Put together, these propositions suggest tha...

متن کامل

Critical issues in hospital antitrust law.

Antitrust litigation involving hospitals is common. This paper describes recent developments and underlying issues in antitrust law with respect to hospital-hospital relations, hospital-physician relations, and hospital-payer relations. A key unanswered question in each of these areas is how government regulation and public purchasing affect competitive markets for hospital services.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010